Advertisements have become an incredibly powerful tool for politicians. They allow candidates to propose their ideas while connecting with voters. In general, the more money a candidate spends on advertisements, the higher their chances are of winning the election. In the 2008 election, for example, Barack Obama spent $280 million on advertising from January 1st to November 1st, while John McCain only spent $134 million.
Positive Ads
Positive political advertisements highlight the positive qualities and accomplishments of the candidate. They are often aimed at a specific demographic of voters or focus on specific issues. Here are some examples of effective positive ads:
Negative Ads
Negative advertisements are created to produce doubt about the opposing candidate's competence as a leader. Although the idea of negative ads is unpopular, they are extremely effective. Here are some examples of negative advertisements:
Issue Ads
Issue ads promote a candidate by focusing on specific issue. They do not directly advocate a candidate, but only use a specific issue to highlight the strengths or weaknesses of a candidate. Issue ads are funded by PACs or individuals, not the candidate.
Media Coverage of Ads
Advertisements can be even more effective when they catch the attention of news stations. For example, this ad, attacking Barry Goldwater, only aired once on television, but was played repeatedly on the news, making it a significant factor contributing to Lyndon B. Johnson's win in the election.
No comments:
Post a Comment